AI Resume Screening in 2026: How ATS Actually Works

Before your resume reaches a hiring manager, it passes through software. Over 99% of Fortune 500 companies use some form of Applicant Tracking System (ATS), and the majority of mid-sized employers now do too. Estimates suggest that 75% of resumes are filtered out before a human ever reads them.

Understanding how these systems work is not about gaming the process. It is about making sure your application is readable in the first place.

What ATS Actually Is

An Applicant Tracking System is software that receives, parses, and organises job applications. Its original function was administrative - collecting applications, storing them, moving candidates through stages. The filtering function came later as application volumes grew.

Modern ATS platforms are not simply checking for a list of keywords. The leading systems in 2026 use Natural Language Processing (NLP) and semantic matching. They read the meaning of your text, not just the exact words. A resume that mentions "revenue optimisation" may still match a job posting that asks for "sales growth" because the system understands the relationship between those phrases.

This is a meaningful shift from the keyword-stuffing advice that circulated five to ten years ago. Stuffing a resume with exact phrases lifted from a job description will not fool a semantic matching system and may actively flag the document as low quality.

What Modern ATS Systems Score

Beyond skills matching, AI-enhanced ATS tools score several additional factors.

Job tenure patterns matter. Frequent short tenures are scored negatively by some systems, regardless of context. If you have legitimate reasons for shorter roles - contracting, company closures, structured rotations - making that context visible in your resume helps.

Skills adjacency is scored positively. A system evaluating a data analyst role will give credit for related skills - SQL, Python, Excel, BI tools - even if every skill is not listed in the posting.

Communication quality is assessed at the text level. Grammatical errors, inconsistent formatting, and unclear sentence structure reduce scores on platforms that use language model scoring. Clear, direct writing is an advantage.

Quantified achievements perform better than general statements. "Reduced processing time by 30%" parses differently from "improved efficiency" in semantic systems because it carries measurable signal.

Format Rules That Help

Here is where many candidates lose points before content is even evaluated.

Simple, single-column layouts consistently outperform creative or multi-column designs in ATS parsing. Tables, text boxes, headers and footers, and graphics frequently cause parsing errors. The ATS may read your contact information as body text, or skip entire sections.

Use standard section headings: Work Experience, Education, Skills. Creative alternatives like "Where I Have Been" or "What I Bring" are not reliably recognised by parsing systems.

Save files as .docx or PDF, depending on what the application form specifies. If no format is specified, .docx is typically safer for ATS parsing. PDFs generated from Word or Google Docs usually parse correctly; PDFs generated from design tools often do not.

Avoid headers and footers for contact information. Place your name, email, and LinkedIn URL in the main body of the document.

Tailoring Efficiently

Because modern ATS uses semantic matching, efficient tailoring is possible without rewriting your entire resume for every application.

Read the job posting and identify the three to five skills or competencies that appear most prominently. Confirm your resume uses similar language for those areas. If the posting emphasises "stakeholder management" and your resume says "client communication," aligning that language is worth doing.

Focus tailoring effort on the professional summary and the most recent role. These sections are weighted most heavily by both ATS systems and the human reviewers who see applications that pass the filter.

A Harvard Business School study from 2025 raised concern that AI filtering may screen out non-standard but qualified candidates - people with non-linear career paths, career changers, or those with credentials from outside the usual pipeline. If you fall into this category, cover letters that explicitly address the transfer of skills remain valuable precisely because they can reach the human reviewer.

What Gets You Rejected

The most common reasons for ATS rejection are straightforward.

Applying for roles where your experience level does not meet the stated requirements results in rejection at the parsing stage. ATS systems score years of experience in relevant fields and filter below a threshold.

Missing required qualifications - specific certifications, required degrees, mandatory technical skills - trigger hard filters in many systems. If a posting lists something as required rather than preferred, treat it as a gate.

Parsing failures caused by complex formatting mean the system reads incomplete or corrupted data. A resume that looks impressive as a PDF may be unreadable to an ATS if built in design software.

The filtering process is automated and impersonal. Building a resume that is clear, structured, and semantically aligned with the roles you are applying for is not about manipulation - it is about removing unnecessary friction between your actual qualifications and the human who makes the decision.

Career advice should be adapted to your individual circumstances, industry, and goals.

Explore more career strategies at /career.